These numbers make no sense. To have 300 hp at 2700 rpm, that would require 583 ft-lbs at 2700 rpm, but you say that at 2400 rpm, the torque has already dropped to 320 ft-lbs. Time to revisit your numbers/assumptions :)
Printable View
CAT's output numbers are what I based my figures on. What it really produces I won't know until I dyno the engine.
Is this a "Shootout" thread? seems off topic
This thread needs a do-over. We need a very rich person to donate several identically equipped Wranglers and one of each of the forced induction kits so that a full and fair comparison can be done on everything from the install difficulty to performance :)
Its hard to keep everything equal when testing power mods. Realize, we got each about a year apart. All the jeeps are 4.10 geared manual trans rubicons. The turbo was a 2door, the two SCs, on 4drs.
BB had a lift and duratracs when the SC came on. Sweet Pea was bone stock. They were tested as evenly as we could have done it.
True, I am surprised that the RIPP pulls that well at the bottom, however, the Magnuson seems to have more power where i generally use it between 2,000 and 4,500 RPM. I drive a manual, and generally do not spin the motor up to redline when shifting. Daily Driver purposes, the Magnuson appears to be the winner; on paper anyways.
Just curious as to whether Sweet Pea and Black Beauty have had MPG recorded regularly since their respective supercharger installations? I use Fuelly myself, and am really curious to figure out not only which is better $ per torque/hp, but also which has better overall fuel economy.
I would guess that RIPP would win the MPG battle. Has anyone been keeping decent hand-calculated MPG records?